Thursday, January 30, 2014

Christian Anarchism: The Constantinian Shift




The Constantinian Shift
The concept of the 'Constantinian Shift' is central to the Christian Anarchists' historical thesis. It appears in many alternative Christian political theologies and was popularised most recently by John Howard Yoder, but it has an older provenance within Christian Anarchism. Peter Chelčicky's 1443 Net of True Faith1 views the Pope and the Emperor as the two great whales that broke the net of faith. He articulates the Constantinian Shift idea very clearly: “When Emperor Constantine was received into the fold of faith with his pagan rule and rights and offices, then the innocence of the true Christians was saddened and defiled.”2 The conversion of Constantine has been seen as a watershed – the moment when Christianity lost its political identity as a radical group willing to endure persecution and became a power-hungry state-sponsored religion. In Gregory A. Boyd's words, the church was transformed “From resident aliens to conquering warlords.”3

Critics of church interaction with political power have used Constantine as a potent symbol of church compromise, or of complete a betrayal of Christ's teachings. In 1443 Chelčicky writes:

All the temporal lords who, begotten by Constantine and established through deception in the name of faith, enjoy pagan ruling and pagan sodomitic living; they put themselves apart from Christ and cannot be partakers of his fellowship.4

Likewise, Adin Ballou in 1900:
It could be only a worldly convenience, a bond-servant of worldly power, an instrument of political engineering or of social respectability, a tool of cunning priestcraft in an unholy alliance with worldly statecraft. Alas, that, as a matter of fact, the Christian Church, since the days of Constantine, has been to a large extent thus prostituted.5

In 2011 Alexandre Christoyannopoulos states: “Constantine tempted the church with political power and economic comfort. The higher clergy was seduced. ”6 The strong language7 indicates the intensity of feeling around church-government interactions that has persisted throughout history. The 'Constantinian shift' has been a focus for these feelings.

While it is demonstrably true that a 'shift' in the church's attitude to government occurred, attributing that change solely to Constantine's conversion is overly simplistic. Jonathan Bartley acknowledges: “There is no clear dividing line between pre-Christendom and Christendom”8 Rather than a single, catastrophic event which caused the unravelling of the church's radical politics, a slow and gradual change can be charted. Under threat of persecution and heresy the church had found security in its own power structures. The hierarchy was crystallised. Christian writings began to soften in their attitude to the state. In 248 Origen wrote that Christians would make better rulers and began to conceive of a Christian State - a temporal 'City of God'.9 Bartley writes:
In their apologies for a more sympathetic view of government church leaders more often appealed to the Hebrew scriptures and the writings of Paul than to the teachings of Jesus. Already, the political Jesus was beginning to be sidelined by some in the church, well before the time of Constantine.10

The politics of the Christian church encountered by Constantine was already far removed from the radical counter-imperial movement of the previous century. Yet the conversion of Constantine11 and the institution of Nicene Christianity as the state church of the Roman Empire under Theodosius I12 are important watersheds. In summary, the 'Constantinian Shift' idea is not a historically accurate account of the development of the church's attitude to government, but it is a culturally significant myth – a useful short-hand that represents the wider reality.




The myth originates with a Vatican document Donatio Constantini (later discovered to be a forgery) which had been used by Popes to justify the church's political power. The document was an alleged imperial decree, giving power over Rome and the western part of the empire to the Pope. The document and the idea that it represented then became a significant target for those who wished to criticise the church's use of political power. The Waldensians created an origin story that stretched back to Constantine and the event of the donation. The story states that Pope Sylvester's colleagues argued with him that it was against Christ to accept political power. Interestingly, they outline what would later become classic Christian Anarchist arguments:
'Has not the Lord given us a precept not to possess temporal and material goods? Indeed, did He not say to his disciples that they should ‘take neither gold, nor silver, nor money in their purse, neither two coats, nor shoes, nor yet staves,’ and that ‘the workman is worthy of his hire?’ And did He not also say, ‘If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me?’ It was indeed so, and we know that Peter said to Him, ‘Behold, we have forsaken all, and followed thee.’'13

The Waldensians claimed the donation of Constantine as the single moment that the church compromised with the state and caused the schism to which they owed their origins. It was said that this fundamental change was heralded by a voice from heaven: “Today poison has been introduced into the Church of God.”14 It is the version of the story that is passed on to Peter Chelčicky, and from him to Tolstoy15, cementing its place in the Christian Anarchist psyche.





1This is a proto-Christian-Anarchist work which focusses on equality, church-state interaction as compromise, and Christians having Jesus as their only authority.
2Enrico C. S. Molnár. A Study of Peter Chelčicky's Life and a Translation from Czech of Part One of his Net of Faith: A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Church History, Pacific School of Religion. Berkeley, California, 1947. Pg 83
http://www.elcristianismoprimitivo.com/Net_of_Faith.pdf
(accessed 16/08/12)
3Gregory A. Boyd The Myth of a Christian Nation. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan, 2005. Pg 67.
4Enrico C. S. Molnár. A Study of Peter Chelčicky's Life and a Translation from Czech of Part One of his Net of Faith: A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Church History, Pacific School of Religion. Berkeley, California, 1947. Pg 83
http://www.elcristianismoprimitivo.com/Net_of_Faith.pdf
(accessed 16/08/12)
5Adin Ballou. Primitive Christianity and its Corruptions. Vol. III. Department of Ecclesiastical Polity: A Series of Discourses. Lowell, Massachusetts: Thompson & Hill, 1900. Pg.48 http://archive.org/details/primitivechristicc03ball (accessed 16/8/12)
6Alexandre Christoyannopoulos. Christian Anarchism: A Political Commentary on the Gospel (Abridged Edition). Exeter: Imprint Academic, 2011. Pg. 109
7It is probably no coincidence that the three quotes above each include a degree of sexual language. Sexual betrayal is used throughout scripture as an image of unfaithfulness to God. In the anarchist context, these quotes particularly echo the depiction of empire in the book of Revelation as the Great Whore from whom God's people are commanded to 'come out'. Revelation 18:4 (NIV)
8Jonathan Bartley. Faith and Politics after Christendom: The Church as a Movement for Anarchy. Milton Keynes: Paternoster Press, 2006.Pg 30
9Origen. Against Celsus III:29-30 cited in Jonathan Bartley. Faith and Politics after Christendom: The Church as a Movement for Anarchy. Milton Keynes: Paternoster Press, 2006.Pg 30
10Jonathan Bartley. Faith and Politics after Christendom: The Church as a Movement for Anarchy. Milton Keynes: Paternoster Press, 2006.Pg 30
11c.312 AD (Battle of Milvian Bridge)
12380-381 AD
13Anonymous. From the Archives: Waldensian Legend Concerning the Donation of Constantine to Pope Sylvester (date unknown). Christian History.net
http://www.christianitytoday.com/ch/1989/issue22/2233b.html
(accessed 16/08/12)
14Anonymous. From the Archives: Waldensian Legend Concerning the Donation of Constantine to Pope Sylvester (date unknown). Christian History.net
http://www.christianitytoday.com/ch/1989/issue22/2233b.html
(accessed 16/08/12)

15Leo Tolstoy. The Kingdom of God is Within You. Translated by Constance Garnet. Kansas: Digireads, 2005. Pg. 15

No comments: